超声引导下短轴、长轴、斜轴平面桡动脉穿刺置管术的对照研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

赣南医科大学第一附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

赣州市科技计划项目(编号:2023DXNS4406);


A comparative study of radial artery puncture and catheterization in ultrasound-guided short-axis, long-axis and oblique-axis planes#
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较超声引导下短轴、长轴、斜轴平面桡动脉穿刺置管术的临床效果。方法:选取2023年5月~2025年5月本院收治120例桡动脉穿刺置换术患者作为研究对象,利用随机数表法分成四组,每组各30例。对照组(D组)手术中应用盲探法穿刺,短轴组(S组)手术中利用超声引导下短轴法穿刺,长轴法(L组)手术中利用超声引导下长轴法穿刺,斜轴法(O组)手术中利用超声引导下斜轴法穿刺。对比S组、L组、O组超声定位成像时间,四组临床指标(首次穿刺置管成功率、穿刺置管成功总时间、首次成功穿刺时间、首次成功穿刺与置管时间),穿刺置管效果以及穿刺并发症情况。结果:S组超声定位成像时间短于L组与O组(P<0.05);S组、L组、O组首次穿刺置管成功率高于D组,穿刺置管成功总时间、首次成功穿刺时间以及首次成功穿刺与置管时间均比D组更短,且O组穿刺置管成功总时间、首次成功穿刺时间相较于S组、L组均更短,首次成功穿刺与置管时间与S组相比更短(P<0.05);S组、L组、O组穿刺置管优良率率均高于D组(P<0.05);S组、L组、O组穿刺并发症发生率均低于D组(P<0.05)。结论:超声引导下桡动脉穿刺效果优于传统盲探穿刺法,可提高首次穿刺成功率,缩短穿刺置管时间,超声引导下斜轴平面在桡动脉穿刺置管术中的效果相较于短轴与长轴平面穿刺具有优势。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To compare the clinical effect of radial artery puncture and catheterization in ultrasound-guided short-axis, long-axis and oblique-axis planes. Methods: A total of 120 patients undergoing radial artery puncture and catheterization in the hospital were enrolled as the research objects between May 2023 and May 2025. According to random number table method, they were divided into control group (group D, blind puncture), short-axis group (group S, ultrasound-guided short-axis puncture), long-axis group (group L, ultrasound-guided long-axis puncture) and oblique-axis group (group O, ultrasound-guided oblique-axis puncture), 30 cases in each group. The imaging time of ultrasound positioning among group S, group L and group O, as well as clinical indexes (success rate of the first puncture and catheterization, total spending time of successful puncture and catheterization, the first success time of puncture, the first time of successful puncture and catheterization), effect of puncture and catheterization, and puncture complications among the four groups were compared. Results: The imaging time of ultrasound positioning in group S was shorter than that in group L and group O (P<0.05). The success rate of the first puncture and catheterization in group S, group L and group O was higher than that in group D, total spending time of successful puncture and catheterization, the first success time of puncture and the first time of successful puncture and catheterization were shorter than those in group D. Moreover, total spending time of successful puncture and catheterization and the first success time of puncture in group O were shorter than those in group S and group L, and the first time of successful puncture and catheterization was shorter than that in group S (P<0.05). The good rate of puncture and catheterization in group S, group L and group O was higher than that in group D (P<0.05), and incidence of puncture complications was lower than that in group D (P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture is superior to that of traditional blind puncture, which can increase success rate of the first puncture and shorten the time of puncture and catheterization. Compared with short-axis and long-axis planes, radial artery puncture and catheterization in ultrasound-guided oblique axis plane has more advantages.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

钟玉婷.超声引导下短轴、长轴、斜轴平面桡动脉穿刺置管术的对照研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(9):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-08
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-27
  • 录用日期:2026-03-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码