经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗与无张力尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗对子宫脱垂合并压力性尿失禁患者治疗效果的对比研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

洛宁县人民医院 妇产科 河南 洛阳

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative study on the therapeutic effects of concurrent treatment with obturator mid-urethral suspension and concurrent treatment with tension-free mid-urethral suspension on patients with uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinenceSong Yuanyuan 1, Wang Hui 2, Zhang Lili 2
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究对比经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗与无张力尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗对子宫脱垂合(POP)并压力性尿失禁(SUI)患者治疗效果。方法 选取2022年1月至2024年12月期间在本院就诊的POP合并SUI患者82例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(n=41)和观察组(n=41)。两组均接受盆底重建术。在此基础上,对照组采用无张力尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗,观察组采用经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗。分析比较两组的疗效、围手术指标、生活质量和并发症发生率。结果 观察组的治疗有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、置管时间、术后VAS评分和住院时间均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后6个月,两组的盆底疾病生存质量量表(PFIQ-7)、盆底功能障碍性疾病评分表(PEDI-20)和性生活质量评分表(POSQ-12)评分均比术前显著上升(P<0.05),B超测定残余尿量和尿失禁次数均比术前显著下降(P<0.05);且观察组上述指标改善幅度均显著大于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的排尿困难发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 盆底重建术联合经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗子宫脱垂合并压力性尿失禁,能提高临床治疗效果,且手术时间短、创伤小、恢复快,能效改善患者盆底功能及尿动力学,提高生活质量,减少并发症,降低复发率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore and compare the therapeutic effects of concurrent treatment with obturator mid-urethral suspension and concurrent treatment with tension-free mid-urethral suspension on patients with uterine prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: 82 patients with POP combined with SUI who visited our hospital from January 2022 to December 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were divided into the control group (n=41) and the observation group (n=41) by the random number table method. Both groups underwent pelvic floor reconstruction. On this basis, the control group was treated with tension-free mid-urethral suspension during the same period, while the observation group was treated with obturator mid-urethral suspension during the same period. The therapeutic effects, perioperative indicators, quality of life and incidence of complications of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, catheterization time, postoperative VAS score and hospital stay of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Six months after the operation, the scores of the Pelvic Floor Disease Quality of Life Scale (PFIQ-7), the Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Scale (PEDI-20), and the Quality of Sexual Life Scale (POSQ-12) in both groups increased significantly compared with those before the operation (P<0.05), and the residual urine volume and the frequency of urinary incontinence measured by B-ultrasound decreased significantly compared with those before the operation (P<0.05). Moreover, the improvement amplitudes of the above indicators in the observation group were significantly greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of dysuria in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Pelvic floor reconstruction combined with mid-urethral suspension via the obturator for concurrent treatment of uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence can improve the clinical therapeutic effect. It has a short operation time, less trauma, quick recovery, and can effectively improve the pelvic floor function and urodynamics of patients, enhance the quality of life, reduce complications, and lower the recurrence rate.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋园园.经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗与无张力尿道中段悬吊术同期治疗对子宫脱垂合并压力性尿失禁患者治疗效果的对比研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(8):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-12
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-12
  • 录用日期:2025-12-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码