盆底超声在产后压力性尿失禁康复疗效评估中的作用
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

洛阳市妇幼保健院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The role of pelvic floor ultrasound in the evaluation of the therapeutic effect of postpartum stress urinary incontinence rehabilitation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨盆底超声在产后压力性尿失禁(Stress Urinary Incontinence,SUI)康复疗效评估中的作用。方法:选择本院106例产后SUI产妇为研究对象(均于2022年6月-2024年6月在本院分娩),所有患者均实施盆底肌训练,依据训练结果分为疗效显著组(n=90)与疗效不佳组(n=16),两组均进行盆底超声检查,比较两组Valsalva状态下的盆底超声检测指标,并记录膀胱膨出率、尿道内口漏斗形成率。结果:疗效显著组康复后的Valsalva动作下膀胱颈移动度24.15±4.82mm、膀胱尿道后角(130.63±9.51)°低于疗效不佳组,肛提肌应变率(20.15±3.20)%高于疗效不佳组(P<0.05)。疗效显著组膀胱膨出率(15.56% vs 43.75%)、尿道内口漏斗形成率(12.22% vs 37.50%)低于疗效不佳组(P<0.05)。经ROC曲线分析,膀胱颈移动度、膀胱尿道后角、肛提肌应变率及3项联合预测产后SUI患者康复疗效的AUC为0.790、0.802、0.725、0.851,当上述3项指标的临界值为25.893 mm、124.120°、18.774%时,其对应敏感度分别为90.00%、93.33%、87.78%,3项联合的敏感度为95.56%。结论:盆底超声在产后SUI康复疗效评估具有一定价值,能为患者预后判断提供客观依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the role of pelvic floor ultrasound in the evaluation of the rehabilitation efficacy of postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: A total of 106 postpartum women with SUI (all delivered in our hospital between June 2022 and June 2024) were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent pelvic floor muscle training and were divided into a significant efficacy group (n=90) and a poor efficacy group (n=16) based on the training. Results: Both groups underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examination. The pelvic floor ultrasound examination parameters under Valsalva maneuver were compared between the two groups, and the cystocele rate and urethral funnel formation rate were recorded. Results After rehabilitation, the bladder neck movement under Valsalva maneuver 24.15±4.82mm and the posterior urethral angle (130.63±9.51)° in the significant efficacy group were significantly lower than those in the poor efficacy group, and the levator ani strain rate (20.15±3.20)% was significantly higher than that in the poor efficacy group (P<0.05). The rates of cystocele (15.56% vs 43.75%) and urethral funneling (12.22% vs 37.50%) in the significant efficacy group were significantly lower than those in the poor efficacy group (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the AUCs for bladder neck mobility, posterior urethral angle, levator ani strain rate, and their combined effect in predicting the rehabilitation efficacy of postpartum SUI patients were 0.790, 0.802, 0.725, and 0.851, respectively. When the critical values of the three indicators were 25.893 mm, 124.120°, and 18.774%, respectively, the corresponding sensitivities were 90.00%, 93.33%, and 87.78%, respectively. The combined sensitivity of the three indicators was 95.56%. Conclusion: Pelvic floor ultrasound has a certain value in evaluating the rehabilitation efficacy of postpartum SUI and can provide an objective basis for patient prognosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-17
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-18
  • 录用日期:2025-12-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码