小骨窗开颅血肿清除术与钻孔血肿抽吸引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

信阳信钢医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical comparison of small bone window craniotomy for hematoma evacuation and drilling hematoma aspiration and drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较小骨窗开颅血肿清除术与钻孔血肿抽吸引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果。方法:回顾性收集2022年1月-2024年12月期间本院收治的经小骨窗开颅血肿清除术治疗的46例高血压脑出血患者的临床资料,纳入A组。选取同期经钻孔血肿抽吸引流术治疗的43例高血压脑出血患者的临床资料,纳入B组。统计对比两组的手术情况、术后并发症、神经功能[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分]以及日常生活能力[Barthel指数(Barthel Index,BI)]。结果:相较于A组,B组的手术时间显著缩短、术中出血量显著减少、72血肿清除率显著提高(P<0.05)。B组的术后并发症发生率显著低于A组(P<0.05)。术后1个月,两组的NIHSS评分均较术前显著下降,且B组的NIHSS评分显著低于A组(P<0.05)。术后3个月,两组的BI评分均较术前显著提高(P<0.05),但两组的BI评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:相较于小骨窗开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血,钻孔血肿抽吸引流术的总体效果更佳,不仅可缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量和术后并发症,还可更彻底清除血肿,有助于术后神经功能恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To compare the clinical effects of small bone window craniotomy for hematoma evacuation and borehole hematoma aspiration and drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: The clinical data of 46 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent craniotomy and hematoma evacuation via small bone window in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2024 were retrospectively collected and included in Group A. The clinical data of 43 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated by borehole hematoma aspiration and drainage during the same period were selected and included in Group B. The surgical conditions, postoperative complications and neurological functions [National Institute of Health stroke scale, USA] NIHSS score and activities of daily living [Barthel Index (Barthel Index, BI)] of the two groups were statistically compared. Result: Compared with group A, the operation time of group B was significantly shortened, the intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced, and the hematoma clearance rate at 72 was significantly increased (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (P < 0.05). One month after the operation, the NIHSS scores of both groups decreased significantly compared with those before the operation, and the NIHSS score of group B was significantly lower than that of group A (P < 0.05). Three months after the operation, the BI scores of both groups were significantly improved compared with those before the operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the BI scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with small bone window craniotomy for hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, the overall effect of borehole hematoma aspiration and drainage is better. It can not only shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, but also remove the hematoma more thoroughly, which is conducive to the recovery of postoperative neurological function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘洋.小骨窗开颅血肿清除术与钻孔血肿抽吸引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床比较[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(9):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-11
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-29
  • 录用日期:2025-12-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码