不同剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇及新生儿的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

洛阳市东方人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The effect of different doses of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil spinal epidural anesthesia on cesarean section mothers and newborns
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:本研究旨在探讨不同剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇及新生儿的影响,以期为临床麻醉方案的选择提供科学依据。方法:本研究选取了2022年12月至2024年6月期间接受剖宫产手术的539名产妇作为研究对象,经过严格的纳入与排除标准筛选后,最终纳入466名产妇。根据腰硬联合麻醉中罗哌卡因的用药浓度、比重及剂量,将产妇分为两组:HSA组(236例)采用低比重低剂量罗哌卡因(0.285%)复合舒芬太尼蛛网膜下腔注射,GSA组(199例)则采用重比重中等剂量罗哌卡因(0.5%)。结果:两组各时间段的椎管内麻醉效果评级1级率以及1min、5min的Apgar评分无统计学差异性(P>0.05),HSA组感觉阻滞维持时间、痛觉恢复距术毕时间、行走距术毕时间均短于GSA组(P<0.05),40-50min、1h-1.5h、1.5-2h时所用的药物浓度、比重及剂量、仰卧位低血压占比、不良反应发生率均低于GSA组,感觉阻滞平面维持时间短于GSA组,术毕即刻肌力4级以上率高于GSA组(P<0.05)。同时,HSA组SPO2、MAP、心率的变异度均低于GSA组(P<0.05),术后6h、24h、48h、72h的VAS评分以及Bromage评分均低于GSA组(P<0.05)。结论:在剖宫产产妇的腰硬联合麻醉中,采用低比重低剂量罗哌卡因(0.285%)复合舒芬太尼进行干预,能够更好地稳定产妇的血流动力学,降低不良反应发生率,提高麻醉安全性,同时促进产妇术后恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the effects of different doses of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil spinal epidural anesthesia on cesarean section mothers and newborns, in order to provide scientific basis for the selection of clinical anesthesia regimens. Methods: This study selected 539 parturients who underwent cesarean section surgery between December 2022 and June 2024 as the research subjects. After strict inclusion and exclusion criteria screening, 466 parturients were finally included. According to the concentration, specific gravity, and dose of ropivacaine used in spinal epidural anesthesia, parturients were divided into two groups: the HSA group (236 cases) received low-dose ropivacaine (0.285%) combined with sufentanil subarachnoid injection, while the GSA group (199 cases) received medium dose ropivacaine (0.5%) with high specific gravity. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the grade 1 rate and Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes of spinal anesthesia efficacy between the two groups at different time periods. The HSA group had shorter sensory block maintenance time, pain recovery time to completion, and walking time to completion than the GSA group (P<0.05). The drug concentration, proportion, and dosage used at 40-50 minutes, 1-1.5 hours, and 1.5-2 hours, as well as the proportion of supine hypotension and incidence of adverse reactions, were lower than those in the GSA group. The sensory block plane maintenance time was shorter than that in the GSA group, and the rate of muscle strength above grade 4 immediately after completion was higher than that in the GSA group (P<0.05). At the same time, the variability of SPO2, MAP, and heart rate in the HSA group was lower than that in the GSA group (P<0.05), and the VAS scores and Bromage scores at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery were lower than those in the GSA group (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the lumbar epidural anesthesia of cesarean section women, the intervention of low specific gravity and low dose ropivacaine (0.285%) combined with sufentanil can better stabilize the hemodynamics of the women, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, improve anesthesia safety, and promote postoperative recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭宜姣,曹军涛.不同剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇及新生儿的影响[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(12):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-01
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-15
  • 录用日期:2025-08-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码