PDCA质控循环管理联合多部门协同干预对住院病案首页填写质量的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

许昌市妇幼保健院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The influence of PDCA quality control cycle management combined with multi-department collaborative intervention on the quality of the first page filling of inpatient medical recordsWang Songwei *
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察PDCA质控循环管理联合多部门协同干预对住院病案首页填写质量的效果。方法 回顾性收集2023年1月-2023年12月期间本院采用常规管理+多部门协同干预的110例住院患者的病案资料纳入对照组;收集2024年1月-2024年12月期间采用PDCA质控循环管理联合多部门协同干预的110例住院患者的病案资料纳入观察组。统计比较两组的诊断质控指标、诊断错误责任情况以及管理质量(DRG评分)。结果 观察组的首页资料完整例数、主要诊断选择正确例数、主要诊断编码选择正确例数均较对照组显著提高(P<0.05)。观察组的临床医师错误例数、编码员错误例数、两者皆错例数均显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的主诊断编码有效性、主诊断选择合理性、合并编码规范性各项管理质量评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 PDCA质控循环管理联合多部门协同干预,能提高病案首页填写质量,减少病案填写相关系统性错误的发生,提高病案管理质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the effect of PDCA quality control cycle management combined with multi-department collaborative intervention on the quality of the first page filling of inpatient medical records. Methods: The medical record data of 110 inpatients who received conventional management and multi-department collaborative intervention in our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected and included in the control group. The medical record data of 110 inpatients who received PDCA quality control cycle management combined with multi-department collaborative intervention from January 2024 to December 2024 were collected and included in the observation group. The diagnostic quality control indicators, responsibility for diagnostic errors and management quality (DRG score) of the two groups were statistically compared. Results: The number of cases with complete homepage data, the number of cases with correct selection of the main diagnosis, and the number of cases with correct selection of the main diagnostic code in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of errors made by clinicians, by coders, and by both in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of the validity of the main diagnostic code, the rationality of the main diagnostic selection, and the standardization of the combined code in the observation group were all significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The PDCA quality control cycle management combined with multi-department collaborative intervention can improve the quality of the first page filling of medical records, reduce the occurrence of systematic errors related to medical record filling, and enhance the quality of medical record management.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王松伟. PDCA质控循环管理联合多部门协同干预对住院病案首页填写质量的影响[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(8):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-17
  • 录用日期:2025-10-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码