超声与CTA联合应用在颈动脉狭窄分级诊断中的效能评估
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

郑州人民医院超声医学科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Evaluation of the efficacy of the combined application of ultrasound and CTA in the grading diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:评价颈部血管超声(Cervical vascular ultra sound,CVUS)与CT血管成像(Computed tomography angiography,CTA)联合应用在颈动脉狭窄(Carotid artery stenosis,CAS)分级诊断中的效能。方法:收集我院2020年1月~2024年12月同期行CVUS、CTA和DSA检查的92例CAS患者的影像学资料,以DSA为“金标准”,对比CVUS、CTA单独及联合检查在不同狭窄程度中诊断价值。结果:DSA检查共发现115条狭窄血管,其中狭窄程度≥70%者68条,<70%者47条。对于115条狭窄血管,CDUS检出阳性64条、阴性51条,CTA检出阳性68条、阴性47条,联合检查共检出阳性76条、阴性39条。二项联合与DSA诊断结果比较具有高度一致性(Kappa=0.784、0.815,P<0.001)二者联合诊断CAS的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值依次为98.53%、80.85%、91.30%、88.16%和97.44%,均明显高于单独使用CDUS检测(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示CDUS、CTA和二者联合诊断颈动脉狭窄分级的AUC分别为0.809(95%CI:0.724~0.893)、0.892(95%CI:0.824~0.960)和0.897(95%CI:0.827~0.967)。结论: CVUS与CTA均是CAS的有效诊断方法,二者联合的诊断效果与DAS一致性更高。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the combined application of cervical vascular ultrasound (CVUS) and CT angiography (CTA) in the grading diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Methods: The imaging data of 92 CAS patients who underwent CVUS, CTA and DSA examinations from January 2020 to December 2024 were collected in our hospital. DSA was the "gold standard", and the diagnostic value of CVUS, CTA alone and combined examinations in different degrees of stenosis was compared. Results: DSA examination revealed a total of 115 narrowed blood vessels, including 68 with stenosis degree ≥70% and 47 with stenosis degree <70%. For 115 narrowed blood vessels, CDUS detected 64 positive and 51 negative, CTA detected 68 positive and 47 negative, and combined examination detected a total of 76 positive and 39 negative. The results of the combined diagnosis of CAS and DSA showed high consistency (Kappa=0.784, 0.815, P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the combined diagnosis of CAS were 98.53%, 80.85%, 91.30%, 88.16%, and 97.44%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of CDUS detection alone (P<0.05). The ROC curve results showed that the AUC of CDUS, CTA, and their combined diagnosis of carotid stenosis grading were 0.809 (95%CI: 0.724~0.893), 0.892 (95%CI: 0.824~0.960), and 0.897 (95%CI: 0.827~0.967), respectively. Conclusion: CVUS and CTA are both effective diagnostic methods for CAS, and their combined diagnostic effect is more consistent with DAS.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-09
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-30
  • 录用日期:2025-10-31
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: