氢吗啡酮PCIA滴定与盐酸吗啡片治疗重度癌性疼疗效对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

三门峡市中心医院肿瘤内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

三门峡市2023年科技攻关项目(编号:2023L02025)


Comparative study on the Therapeutic Effects of hydromorphinone PCIA titration and Morphine Hydrochloride Tablets in the Treatment of Severe Cancer PainSu Jing 1, Xue Lingfei 2, Wang Yingping 2, Zhang Xiaotong 2
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 观察对比氢吗啡酮自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)滴定治疗与盐酸吗啡片治疗重度癌性疼痛的镇痛效果和安全性。 方法 选取2022年6月-2024年6月期间本院收治的诊断为重度癌性疼痛(NRS≥7分)患者72例作为研究对象。按照随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和试验组,每组各36例。对照组采用口服盐酸吗啡片治疗。试验组采用氢吗啡酮PCIA治疗。分析比较两组的治疗情况(疼痛稳定剂量、维持剂量、起效时间、持续时间)、镇痛效果(NRS评分,疼痛缓解率)、生活质量评分(QOL-30)以及不良反应的发生率。结果 试验组的疼痛稳定记录剂量显著低于对照组,平均每日维持剂量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组首次给药后到疼痛稳定控制的药物起效时间显著短于对照组,药效持续时间显著长于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗3d后,两组的NRS评分均比治疗前显著降低,且治疗后试验组的NRS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组的疼痛缓解率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组的QOL-30评分均比治疗前显著上升,且试验组治疗后的QOL-30评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组的不良反应发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 氢吗啡酮PCIA滴定较口服盐酸吗啡片具有更高效、更稳定的镇痛效果,能有效减轻重度癌痛患者的疼痛程度,提高生活质量,且安全性较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe and compare the analgesic effect and safety of hydromorphine-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) titration therapy and morphine hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of severe cancer pain. Methods: 72 patients diagnosed with severe cancer pain (NRS≥7 points) who were admitted to our hospital from June 2022 to June 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were divided into the control group and the experimental group according to the random number table method, with 36 cases in each group. The control group was treated with oral morphine hydrochloride tablets. The experimental group was treated with hydromorphinone PCIA. The treatment conditions (stable pain dose, maintenance dose, onset time, duration), analgesic effect (NRS score, pain relief rate), quality of life score (QOL-30), and the incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The stable recorded dose of pain in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the average daily maintenance dose was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The onset time of the drug from the first administration to the stable control of pain in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, and the duration of drug efficacy was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). Three days after treatment, the NRS scores of both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the NRS score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group after treatment (P<0.05). The pain relief rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the QOL-30 scores of both groups increased significantly compared with those before treatment, and the QOL-30 score of the experimental group after treatment was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Hydromorphine PCIA titration has a more efficient and stable analgesic effect than oral morphine hydrochloride tablets. It can effectively reduce the pain degree of patients with severe cancer pain, improve the quality of life, and has higher safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

苏静.氢吗啡酮PCIA滴定与盐酸吗啡片治疗重度癌性疼疗效对比研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(9):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2025-07-25
  • 录用日期:2025-08-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-24
  • 出版日期: