机械深度排痰对肺部感染患者排痰效果、呼吸力学及炎性因子水平的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

濮阳市中医医院重症医学科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的 观察肺部感染患者应用机械深度排痰对排痰效果、呼吸力学及炎性因子水平的影响。方法 选取我科2023.02-2025.02期间98例肺部感染患者作为研究对象,采用投掷硬币法分组,分为对照组49例予以传统手叩击法排痰,观察组49例予以机械深度排痰。比较2组肺部感染患者排痰效果、呼吸力学【气道峰压(Peak Inspiratory Pressure,PIP)及气道阻力(Airway Resistance,RAW)、肺顺应性(Dynamic Lung Compliance,Cdyn)、呼吸功 (Work of Breathing,WOB)】、炎性因子水平【白细胞介素-6(Interleukin - 6,IL-6)、C反应蛋白(C - reactive protein,CRP)及降钙素原(Procalcitonin,PCT)】及生活质量【生活质量量表(Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short - Form Health Survey,SF-36)】。结果 观察组总有效率91.83%(45/49)高于对照组75.51%(37/49)(P<0.05)。干预前,两组肺部感染患者呼吸力学比较(P>0.05);干预后,两组肺部感染患者PIP、RAW、WOB均降低,观察组较低(P<0.05);Cdyn增高,观察组较高(P<0.05)。干预前,两组肺部感染患者炎性因子水平比较(P>0.05);干预后,两组肺部感染患者IL-6、CRP、PCT均降低,观察组较低(P<0.05)。干预前,两组肺部感染患者生活质量比较(P>0.05);干预后,两组肺部感染患者SF-36各分项得分均降低,观察组较低(P<0.05)。结论 肺部感染患者应用机械深度排痰相较于传统手叩击法排痰能有效提高排痰效果,改善呼吸力学及炎症因子水平,提高生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the effects of mechanical deep expectoration on expectoration effect, respiratory mechanics and levels of inflammatory factors in patients with pulmonary infection. Methods: A total of 98 patients with pulmonary infection in our department during the period from February 2023 to February 2025.were selected as the research subjects. They were grouped by the coin-tossing method. In the control group, 49 cases were given traditional manual tapping for expectoration, and in the observation group, 49 cases were given mechanical deep expectoration. Compare the expectoration effect, respiratory mechanics [Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP), Airway Resistance (RAW), and Dynamic Lung Compliance] of patients with pulmonary infection in the two groups. Cdyn), Work of Breathing (WOB), levels of inflammatory factors [Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein CRP and Procalcitonin (PCT) and quality of life [Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)]. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group was 91.83% (45/49), which was higher than that of the control group at 75.51% (37/49) (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, the comparison of respiratory mechanics between the two groups of patients with pulmonary infection (P > 0.05); After the intervention, the PIP, RAW and WOB of patients with pulmonary infection in both groups decreased, and those in the observation group were lower (P < 0.05). The Cdyn increased, and it was higher in the observation group (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, the levels of inflammatory factors in the two groups of patients with pulmonary infection were compared (P > 0.05); After the intervention, the levels of IL-6, CRP and PCT in both groups of patients with pulmonary infection decreased, and those in the observation group were lower (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, the comparison of the quality of life of patients with pulmonary infection in the two groups (P > 0.05); After the intervention, the scores of each sub-item of SF-36 in both groups of patients with pulmonary infection decreased, and the score in the observation group was lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional manual tapping method for expectoration, the application of mechanical deep expectoration in patients with pulmonary infection can effectively improve the expectoration effect, improve the levels of respiratory mechanics and inflammatory factors, and enhance the quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马利玲.机械深度排痰对肺部感染患者排痰效果、呼吸力学及炎性因子水平的影响[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(8):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-22
  • 最后修改日期:2025-07-23
  • 录用日期:2025-08-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码