胺碘酮和美托洛尔对房颤合并心力衰竭患者治疗效果的对比研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

安阳市第三人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨胺碘酮与美托洛尔治疗房颤合并心力衰竭患者的疗效分析。方法:选取2023年1月至2024年6月期间在本院心内科住院的120例房颤合并心力衰竭患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为胺碘酮组和美托洛尔组,每组各60例。胺碘酮组接受胺碘酮治疗;美托洛尔组采用美托洛尔治疗。分析对比两组的心功能 [左心室射血分数(Left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、NYHA心功能分级]、生活质量(明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷),主要不良心血管事件发生率以及不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,两组的LVEF均较治疗前显著提高,NYHA心功能分级均比治疗前显著降低,且胺碘酮组治疗后的LVEF、NYHA心功能分级改善程度均显著大于美托洛尔组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组的生活质量评分均较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05),且胺碘酮组的生活质量评分显著美托洛尔组(P<0.05)。胺碘酮组MACE总发生率显著低于美托洛尔组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应总发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:对于房颤合并心力衰竭患者,胺碘酮在改善心功能、提高生活质量和降低MACE发生率方面优于美托洛尔的治疗效果。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the efficacy analysis of amiodarone and metoprolol in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure. Methods: 120 patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of our hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were divided into the amiodarone group and the metoprolol group by the random number table method, with 60 cases in each group. The amiodarone group received amiodarone treatment; The metoprolol group was treated with metoprolol. The cardiac function [Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA cardiac function classification], quality of life (Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire), incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and occurrence of adverse reactions were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, the LVEF of both groups was significantly increased compared with that before treatment, and the NYHA cardiac function classification was significantly decreased compared with that before treatment. Moreover, the improvement degrees of LVEF and NYHA cardiac function classification in the amiodarone group after treatment were significantly greater than those in the metoprolol group (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life scores of both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the quality of life score of the amiodarone group was significantly higher than that of the metoprolol group (P<0.05). The total incidence of MACE in the amiodarone group was significantly lower than that in the metoprolol group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: For patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure, amiodarone is superior to metoprolol in terms of therapeutic effect in improving cardiac function, enhancing quality of life and reducing the incidence of MACE.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张媛媛.胺碘酮和美托洛尔对房颤合并心力衰竭患者治疗效果的对比研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(1):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-20
  • 录用日期:2025-08-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码