外周血AA、ADP、COL水平与脑梗死分型及颈动脉IMT的关系研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

平顶山市第二人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Relationship between peripheral blood AA, ADP, COL and classifications of cerebral infarction, carotid IMT
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨外周血花生四烯酸(AA)、腺苷二磷酸(ADP)及胶原(COL)诱导的血小板聚集水平在不同脑梗死分型中的差异,并评估其与颈动脉内中膜厚度(IMT)及斑块形成的相关性。方法 选取2022年4月-2025年2月在平顶山市第二人民医院神经内科收治的80例脑梗死患者为脑梗死组,根据TOAST分型标准分为大动脉粥样硬化型(LAA组,n=40)、心源性栓塞型(CE组,n=24)和小动脉闭塞型(SAO组,n=16)。根据颈动脉超声IMT情况将脑梗死患者分为斑块形成组(n=38)、内膜增厚组(n=24)和内膜正常组(n=18)。收集脑梗死患者一般资料及实验室指标并进行比较,采用Logistic回归分析脑梗死分型的相关因素,并通过ROC曲线评估血小板聚集率对颈动脉斑块形成的诊断价值。结果 LAA组、CE组和SAO组脑梗死患者性别、年龄、糖尿病和饮酒情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组高血压、心律失常发生率、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、AA、ADP、COL诱导下的血小板聚集率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归显示:高血压病史、AA、ADP、COL诱导下的血小板聚集率升高和HDL-C降低是脑梗死分型的影响因素(P<0.05)。斑块形成组HDL-C水平较内膜增厚组和内膜正常组低,AA、ADP、COL诱导下的血小板聚集率较内膜增厚组和内膜正常组高,内膜增厚组HDL-C水平较内膜正常组低,AA、ADP、COL诱导下的血小板聚集率较内膜正常组高(P<0.05)。ROC分析显示:AA、ADP、COL诱导下的血小板聚集率对斑块形成诊断的ROC下曲线面积(AUC)为0.674、0.826和0.679(P<0.05)。结论 外周血AA、ADP、COL诱导的血小板聚集率在不同脑梗死分型中存在差异,尤其在LAA型中显著升高,且与颈动脉内膜厚度及斑块形成密切相关,可作为辅助评估脑梗死类型及斑块风险的重要指标。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the differences in platelet aggregation level induced by peripheral blood arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and collagen (COL) in different classifications of cerebral infarction, and to evaluate their correlation with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque formation. Methods A total of 80 patients with cerebral infarction admitted to Neurology Department of the Second People's Hospital of Pingdingshan were enrolled as cerebral infarction group between April 2022 and February 2025. According to TOAST classification criteria, they were divided into large artery atherosclerosis (LAA group, n=40), cardiogenic embolism (CE group, n=24) and small artery occlusion (SAO group, n=16). According to carotid IMT by carotid ultrasound, they were divided into plaque formation group (n=38), intima thickening group (n=24) and normal intima group (n=18). The general data and laboratory indexes in patients with cerebral infarction were collected and compared. The related factors of cerebral infarction classifications were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis, and diagnostic value of platelet aggregation rate in carotid plaque formation was evaluated by ROC curves. Results There was no significant difference in gender, age, diabetes mellitus or drinking among LAA group, CE group and SAO group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in the incidences of hypertension and arrhythmia, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and platelet aggregation rate induced by AA, ADP and COL among the three groups (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension history, increased platelet aggregation rate induced by AA, ADP and COL, and decreased HDL-C were influencing factors of cerebral infarction classifications (P<0.05). In plaque formation group, intima thickening group and normal intima group, HDL-C level was gradually increased, while platelet aggregation rate induced by AA, ADP and COL was gradually decreased (P<0.05). ROC curves analysis showed that area under ROC curve (AUC) values of platelet aggregation rate induced by AA, ADP and COL in the diagnosis of plaque formation were 0.674, 0.826 and 0.679, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion The platelet aggregation rate induced by peripheral blood AA, ADP and COL is different in different classifications of cerebral infarction, which is significantly increased in LAA especially. The platelet aggregation rate is closely related to carotid IMT and plaque formation, which can be applied as an important auxiliary index to evaluate cerebral infarction types and plaque risks.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邢慧娟.外周血AA、ADP、COL水平与脑梗死分型及颈动脉IMT的关系研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(5):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-29
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-22
  • 录用日期:2025-06-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码