超声脐血流参数联合24小时动态血压监测在妊娠期高血压疾病孕妇中的应用价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

上饶市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application value of ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow combined with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:分析超声脐血流参数联合24小时动态血压监测在妊娠期高血压疾病(Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy,HDP)孕妇中的应用价值。方法:选取2023年1月至2024年10月本院诊治患有HDP的35例孕妇作为观察组,同期,选取35例健康妊娠孕妇作对照组。比较两组超声脐血流参数以及24小时动态血压监测指标;分析超声脐血流参数和动态血压监测指标的相关性;评估对不良妊娠结局的联合预测价值。结果:观察组收缩期峰值流速与舒张末期流速比值(Systolic/Diastolic Ratio,S/D比值)、搏动指数(Pulsatility Index,PI)、阻力指数(Resistance Index,RI)高于对照组,峰值收缩速度(Peak Systolic Velocity,PSV)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组24小时平均脉压(24-hour Pulse Pressure,24hPP)、24小时平均收缩压(24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure,24hSBP)、24小时平均舒张压(24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure,24hDBP)以及血压变异系数(Blood Pressure Variability,BPV)均高于对照组,夜间血压下降率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,观察组PI、RI、S/D比值与动态血压各监测指标呈显著正相关(P<0.05);PSV与动态血压各监测指标呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic,ROC)曲线分析显示,联合检测对不良妊娠结局的预测效能(Area Under the Curve,AUC=0.852),显著优于脐血流参数和动态血压单一检测(AUC=0.732、0.721)。结论:健康孕妇与HDP孕妇的超声脐血流参数和24小时动态血压监测指标差异显著,HDP孕妇的超声脐血流参数与动态血压监测指标,表现出较高的相关性,两者联合检测能够显著提高对不良妊娠结局的准确性。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To analyze the application value of ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow combined with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Methods: From January 2023 to October 2024, 35 pregnant women diagnosed with HDP and treated in the hospital were selected as the observation group. Meanwhile, 35 healthy pregnant women were selected as the control group. The ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators were compared between the two groups. The correlation between ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators was analyzed. The predictive value of combined detection for adverse pregnancy outcome was evaluated. Results: Compared to the control group, pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D ratio) were higher, and peak systolic velocity (PSV) was lower in the observation group (P<0.05). The 24-hour pulse pressure (24hPP), 24-hour systolic blood pressure (24SBP), 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (24DBP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) were higher, and the rate of nocturnal blood pressure decline was lower in the observation group (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that PI, RI, and S/D ratio were positively correlated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators in the observation group (P<0.05). PSV was negatively correlated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of combined detection for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (0.852) was greater than that of each umbilical blood flow parameter or ambulatory blood pressure (0.732, 0.721). Conclusion: There are significant differences in ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators between healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with HDP. There’s a significant correlation between ultrasound parameters of umbilical blood flow and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indicators in pregnant women with HDP. Moreover, combined detection of the two can significantly improve the accuracy of prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-09
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-09
  • 录用日期:2025-06-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: