腋窝入路与乳房下皱襞入路行假体隆乳术的治疗效果的对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

河南整形美容医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative study of the therapeutic effect of breast augmentation with prosthesis by axillary approach and submammary fold approach
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:分析乳房下皱襞入路与腋窝入路行假体隆乳术的效果。方法:选取2022年1月至2024年2月期间于本院整形外科进行假体隆乳术治疗的83例患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将研究对象分为腋窝组(n=41)和下皱襞组(n=42)。下皱襞组采用乳房下皱襞入路假体隆乳术治疗;腋窝组采用腋窝入路假体隆乳术治疗。分析比较两组的手术相关指标、术后疼痛程度[数字评定量表(Numerical Rating Scale,NRS)]、乳房形态变化以及术后并发症发生率。结果:两组的假体植入操作时间、术后3d内引流量均无显著差异(P>0.05);但下皱襞组的手术时间显著短于腋窝组(P<0.05)。术后第1d、术后第2d,两组的VAS评分均无显著差异(P>0.05),术后第3d,下皱襞组的VAS评分显著低于腋窝组(P<0.05)。术前,两组的乳头-乳房下皱襞的经皮距离、胸骨切迹-乳头距离、乳头-正中线距离、乳房总体积均无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后,两组的各线性距离、乳房总体积均较术前显著升高(P<0.05);但两组的术后各线性距离、乳房总体积均无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:假体隆乳术采用乳房下皱襞入路或腋窝入路,假体植入时间、术后引流量、术后并发症发生率相近,均能获得理想的乳房形态;但相较腋窝入路,乳房下皱襞入路手术用时短,术后患者疼痛感轻微。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To analyze the effect of submammary fold approach and axillary approach in breast augmentation with prosthesis. Methods: 83 patients who underwent breast augmentation with prosthesis in the plastic surgery department of our hospital from January 2022 to February 2024 were selected as the study objects. The subjects were divided into axillary group (n=41) and inferior fold group (n=42) by random number table method. The lower fold group was treated with prosthesis augmentation via inferior mammary fold approach. Axillary group was treated with axillary approach prosthesis augmentation mastectomy. The operative indicators, postoperative pain degree [NRS], breast morphological changes and postoperative complication rate of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the operation time of prosthesis implantation and the 3d internal drainage flow between the two groups (P>0.05). The operative time of lower fold group was significantly shorter than that of axillary group (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups were not significantly different on the 1st and 2nd day after surgery (P>0.05), and the VAS scores of the lower fold group were significantly lower than those of the axillary group on the 3rd day after surgery (P<0.05). Before operation, there were no significant differences in the percutaneous distance of the papilla-submammary fold, sternal incisor-nipple distance, papilla-median line distance and total breast volume between the two groups (P>0.05). After operation, the linear distance and total breast volume of both groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative linear distance and total breast volume between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The submammary fold approach or axillary approach is used in breast augmentation with prosthesis. The implantation time, postoperative drainage volume and postoperative complication rate are similar, and ideal breast morphology can be obtained in all cases. However, compared with the axillary approach, the operation time of the submammary fold approach is shorter, and the postoperative pain is less.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

瓮小龙.腋窝入路与乳房下皱襞入路行假体隆乳术的治疗效果的对比研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(11):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-08
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-30
  • 录用日期:2025-06-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-18
  • 出版日期: