快速穿刺取材与一般速度穿刺取材在甲状腺细针细胞学标本取材满意率的对比分析研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

萍乡市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

萍乡市科技计划项目(编号:2024PY056);


A comparative analytical study of the satisfaction rate of thyroid fine-needle cytology specimens obtained by rapid puncture sampling versus normal speed puncture sampling#
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:分析快速穿刺取材与一般速度穿刺取材在甲状腺细针细胞学标本取材满意率的对比。方法:选取2023年3月至2025年2月于萍乡市人民医院诊治的甲状腺结节(TN)患者120例。按不同病情将TN分为有无钙化组,回声不同组,血供组3个亚组,每个亚组均采用不同速度穿刺取材,分别为观察组(快速穿刺取材,穿刺时间<3s)和对照组(一般速度穿刺取材,穿刺时间>3s),每组各60例。比较观察组及对照组患者取材满意率、穿刺并发症发生率以及穿刺疼痛程度。结果:观察组甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统(TBSRTC)取材满意率(91.67%)显著高于对照组(75.00%)(P<0.05);观察组穿刺后疼痛不适(1.67%vs5.00%)、感染(3.33%vs5.00%)、吞咽困难(1.67%vs 6.67%)及术后血肿(1.67%vs5.00%)发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组疼痛数字法评分(NRS)显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在超声引导下采用快速穿刺取材能有效提高取材满意度,减少穿刺并发症发生率,减轻患者疼痛感,值得临床推广应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective:? Analysis of rapid puncture sampling versus normal speed puncture sampling in the satisfaction rate of thyroid fine-needle cytology specimen sampling. Methods:? One hundred and twenty patients with thyroid nodules (TN) diagnosed and treated in Pingxiang People"s Hospital from March 2023 to February 2025 were selected. According to different conditions, TN was divided into three subgroups: with or without calcification group, different echo group, and blood supply group, and each subgroup was sampled by different speeds of puncture, which were respectively the observation group (fast puncture sampling, puncture time <3s) and the control group (general speed puncture sampling, puncture time >3s), with 60 cases in each group. Comparison of patients in the observation group and the control group in terms of satisfaction rate, complication rate of puncture, the degree of pain of puncture, and the degree of pain of puncture. Results:? The satisfaction rate of thyroid cytopathology Bethesda Reporting System for Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) sampling was significantly higher in the observation group (91.67%) than in the control group (75.00%)(P<0.05); the incidence of post-puncture pain and discomfort (1.67% vs 5.00%), infection (3.33%vs5.00%), dysphagia (1.67% vs 6.67%), and postoperative hematoma (1.67% vs 5.00%) was lower in the observation group than in the control group (21.67%)(P<0.05); and the Pain Numeric Ranging Score (NRS) was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion:? The use of rapid puncture sampling under ultrasound guidance can effectively improve the satisfaction of sampling, reduce rate of puncture complications, reduce the patient"s pain, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

肖时雨.快速穿刺取材与一般速度穿刺取材在甲状腺细针细胞学标本取材满意率的对比分析研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(6):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-01
  • 最后修改日期:2025-04-28
  • 录用日期:2025-05-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-22
  • 出版日期: