PFNA内固定术与Wagner柄人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

民权县人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical comparison between PFNA internal fixation and Wagner stem artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:分析PFNA内固定术与Wagner柄人工股骨头置换术在股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)治疗中的临床效果。方法:选取2022年1月-2024年12月期间本院骨科收治的96例IFF患者作为研究对象。随机将患者分为内固定组和股骨头置换组,每组各48例。记录并对比两组的围术期指标、髋关节功能[Harris髋关节功能评分(HHS)]以及住院期间并发症发生情况。结果:相较于股骨头置换组,内固定组的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量均显著降低,术后完全负重时间显著延长(P<0.05)。内固定组术后6个月的HHS评分显著低于股骨头置换组(P<0.05)。两组术后12个月的HHS评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:在IFF的治疗中,应用PFNA内固定术与Wagner柄人工股骨头置换术均能获得较好的远期效果。但PFNA内固定术的手术时间短、创伤小;而Wagner柄人工股骨头置换术能更早进行负重训练,且近期效果相对较好。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of PFNA and Wagner stem artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture (IFF) of femur. Methods: 96 IFF patients admitted to our Department of Orthopedics from January 2022 to December 2024 were selected as the study objects. The patients were randomly divided into internal fixation group and femoral head replacement group, 48 cases in each group. Perioperative parameters, hip function [Harris hip function score (HHS)] and complications during hospitalization were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the femoral head replacement group, the operative time, incision length and intraoperative blood loss in the internal fixation group were significantly reduced, and the postoperative full weight-bearing time was significantly extended (P < 0.05). The HHS score of the internal fixation group at 6 months after surgery was significantly lower than that of the femoral head replacement group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in HHS scores 12 months after surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of IFF, PFNA internal fixation and Wagner stem artificial femoral head replacement can achieve good long-term results. However, the operation time of PFNA internal fixation is short and the trauma is small. In contrast, Wagner stem artificial femoral head replacement can be used earlier for weight training, and the recent results are relatively good.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王科利. PFNA内固定术与Wagner柄人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床比较[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(9):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-28
  • 录用日期:2025-04-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-24
  • 出版日期: