鲁拉西酮与利培酮在急性期精神分裂症患者的应用效果
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

开封市第五人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Efficacy of lurasidone and risperidone in patients with acute schizophreniaZheng Junjun1, Zhou Junya2, Li Yuex3
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 研究鲁拉西酮与利培酮在急性期精神分裂症(SCH)患者的应用效果。方法 选取2022年1月~2023年12月期间本院收治的急性期SCH患病人92例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为为鲁拉西酮组与利培酮组,每组各46例。鲁拉西酮组采用鲁拉西酮治疗,利培酮组采用利培酮治疗。分析对比两组的疗效、认知功能指标[脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)]水平、临床症状严重程度[阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)]及不良反应发生率。结果 鲁拉西酮组的治疗总有效率为91.30%,较利培酮组的71.74%显著提高(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组的BDNF、GDNF水平均比治疗前显著升高,Hcy水平均比治疗前显著降低,且鲁拉西酮组的BDNF、GDNF、Hcy水平的变化幅度均显著大于利培酮组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组的阳性症状评分、阴性症状评分均比治疗前显著降低,且鲁拉西酮组的阳性症状评分、阴性症状评分均显著低于利培酮组(P<0.05)。两组的不良反应发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 与利培酮相比,鲁拉西酮在急性期SCH患者中的应用效果更好,能提高患者的治疗效果,缓解患者临床症状,改善其认知功能,且治疗安全性较好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To study the efficacy of lurasidone and risperidone in patients with acute schizophrenia (SCH). Methods 92 cases of acute SCH patients admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the study objects. Patients were divided into lurasidone group and risperidone group with 46 cases in each group by random number table method. Lurasidone group was treated with lurasidone, risperidone group was treated with risperidone. The therapeutic effect, cognitive function indicators [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cytogenic neurotrophic factor (GDNF), homocysteine (Hcy)] levels, clinical symptom severity [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)] and incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of lurasidone group was 91.30%, which was significantly higher than that of risperidone group (71.74%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of BDNF and GDNF in both groups were significantly higher than before treatment, and the levels of Hcy were significantly lower than before treatment, and the changes of BDNF, GDNF and Hcy in Lurasidone group were significantly greater than those in risperidone group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the positive symptom score and negative symptom score of both groups were significantly lower than before treatment, and the positive symptom score and negative symptom score of lurasidone group were significantly lower than those of risperidone group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with risperidone, lurasidone has a better effect in acute SCH patients, which can improve the therapeutic effect, relieve the clinical symptoms and improve the cognitive function of patients, and has a good therapeutic safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郑俊俊.鲁拉西酮与利培酮在急性期精神分裂症患者的应用效果[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(11):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-09
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-19
  • 录用日期:2025-02-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-18
  • 出版日期: