抗核抗体与抗双链DNA抗体在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的价值研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南阳市第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Study on the value of anti-nuclear antibody and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 分析抗核抗体(Antinuclear antibody,ANA)与抗双链DNA抗体(distrand-DNA,dsDNA抗体)在系统性红斑狼疮(Systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取2022年3月-2024年4月期间本院收治的确诊为SLE患者104例纳入SLE组。另选取同期收治的其他自身免疫性疾病患者83例纳入非SLE组。检测抗核抗体与抗双链DNA抗体。分析对比SLE组与非SLE组ANA、dsDNA抗体阳性率;比较SLE组患者活动期与非活动期ANA、dsDNA抗体阳性率;对比ANA、dsDNA抗体单独及联合对SLE的诊断效能以及与免疫学检查结果的一致性。结果 SLE组ANA、dsDNA抗体阳性率均显著高于非SLE组(P<0.05)。活动期、非活动期SLE患者的ANA、dsDNA抗体阳性率均无显著差异(P>0.05)。ANA联合dsDNA抗体检测SLE的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为97.11%、98.79%、97.86、99.02%、96.47%,高于ANA、dsDNA抗体单独检测。ANA+dsDNA抗体、ANA检测的敏感度高于dsDNA抗体检验,ANA+dsDNA抗体、dsDNA抗体检验的特异度、阳性预测值高于ANA检测,ANA+dsDNA抗体检验的准确率、阴性预测值高于ANA、dsDNA抗体检测(P<0.05)。ANA、dsDNA抗体单独以及联合诊断SLE与免疫学检查结果的一致性Kappa值分别为0.764、0.773、0.975,以联合诊断的一致性最高。结论 ANA联合dsDNA抗体可补全两种方法单独应用的不足,可提高SLE的诊断效能,降低漏诊风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the value of Antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (distrand-DNA) for the diagnosis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods 104 patients diagnosed with SLE admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to April 2024 were included in the SLE group. Another 83 patients with other autoimmune diseases admitted in the same period were included in the non-SLE group. Detection of anti-nuclear antibody and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody. The positive rates of ANA and dsDNA antibodies in SLE group and non-SLE group were analyzed and compared. The positive rates of ANA and dsDNA antibodies in active and inactive SLE patients were compared. The diagnostic efficacy of ANA and dsDNA antibody alone and in combination with SLE were compared, and their consistency with immunological examination results were compared. Results The positive rates of ANA and dsDNA antibody in SLE group were significantly higher than those in non-SLE group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the positive rates of ANA and dsDNA antibody between active and non-active SLE patients (P>0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ANA combined with dsDNA antibody for SLE were 97.11%, 98.79%, 97.86, 99.02% and 96.47%, respectively, which were higher than ANA and dsDNA antibody alone. The sensitivity of ANA+dsDNA antibody and ANA test was higher than that of dsDNA antibody test, the specificity and positive predictive value of ANA+dsDNA antibody and dsDNA antibody test were higher than that of ANA test, and the accuracy and negative predictive value of ANA+dsDNA antibody test were higher than that of ANA test and dsDNA antibody test (P<0.05). The consistency Kappa values of ANA, dsDNA antibody alone and combined diagnosis of SLE and immunological examination were 0.764, 0.773 and 0.975 respectively, with the highest consistency of combined diagnosis. Conclusion ANA combined with dsDNA antibody can make up for the shortcomings of the two methods alone, improve the diagnostic efficiency of SLE and reduce the risk of missed diagnosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李沛芸.抗核抗体与抗双链DNA抗体在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的价值研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(8):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-09
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-07
  • 录用日期:2025-06-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-31
  • 出版日期: