两种不同穿刺方案下椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折的临床对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

宝丰县人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical comparison of vertebroplasty under two different puncture schemes for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in elderly patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的:探讨经皮椎体成形术(Percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)中不同穿刺方案治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)的效果。方法:选取2022年3月至2024年2月期间本院收治的96例老年OVCF患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将96例老年OVCF患者分为单侧组和双侧组,每组各48例。两组患者均行PVP治疗,在此基础上,单侧组行单侧穿刺PVP,双侧组行双侧穿刺PVP。分析比较两组的手术相关指标、疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分(Visual simulation score,VAS)]、腰椎功能[Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry dysfunction index,ODI)]以及并发症发生率。结果:双侧组的X线透视次数、骨水泥用量显著多于单侧组(P<0.05),两组的手术时间、渗漏数均无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后,两组的VAS评分均比术前显著降低(P<0.05),但两组术后的VAS评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后,两组的ODI指数均比术前显著降低,且双侧组的ODI指数显著低于单侧组(P<0.05)。双侧组的骨水泥漏发生率显著低于单侧组(P<0.05),两组的延迟愈合、感染、发热、残余腰背痛发生率均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:PVP治疗老年OVCF采用双侧穿刺,较单侧穿刺能促进腰椎功能恢复,减少骨水泥漏发生,但双侧穿刺增加X线透视次数、骨水泥用量。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the effects of different Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) procedures on the treatment of Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in elderly patients. Methods: 96 elderly patients with OVCF admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to February 2024 were selected as the study objects. 96 elderly patients with OVCF were divided into unilateral group and bilateral group with 48 cases in each group by random number table method. Both groups were treated with PVP. On this basis, the unilateral group was treated with unilateral puncture PVP, and the bilateral group was treated with bilateral puncture PVP. The surgery-related indexes, pain degree [Visual simulation score (VAS)], lumbar function [Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI)] and complication rate of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The number of X-ray fluoroscopy and the amount of bone cement in bilateral group were significantly higher than those in unilateral group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in operation time and leakage number between the two groups (P > 0.05). After surgery, the VAS scores of both groups were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). After operation, the ODI index in both groups was significantly lower than that before operation, and the ODI index in bilateral group was significantly lower than that in unilateral group (P < 0.05). The incidence of bone cement leakage in bilateral group was significantly lower than that in unilateral group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed healing, infection, fever and residual low back pain between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with unilateral puncture, bilateral puncture can promote the recovery of lumbar function and reduce the occurrence of bone cement leakage in the treatment of elderly OVCF, but bilateral puncture can increase the number of X-ray fluoroscopy and the amount of bone cement.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

牛恒.两种不同穿刺方案下椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折的临床对比[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(8):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-25
  • 录用日期:2025-03-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-31
  • 出版日期: