比较不同麻醉诱导药物在老年患者腹腔镜手术中的血流动力学稳定性和术后恢复情况
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

方城县人民医院麻醉科 南阳方城

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


To compare the hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery of different anesthesia induction drugs in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeryWang Changjiang 1 Yang Tao 2 Wang Dongmei
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨不同麻醉诱导药物在老年患者腹腔镜手术中对血流动力学稳定性和术后恢复情况的影响。方法 选取2022年1月-2024年2月我院64例拟行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者,采用随机双盲法分为A组32例、B组32例。两组均予以瑞马唑仑+舒芬太尼+瑞芬太尼+顺阿曲库铵麻醉诱导,其中A组加用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,B组加用依托咪酯诱导麻醉。统计并对比两组手术情况及诱导前(T0)、诱导后(T1)、插管时(T2)、切皮时(T3)、拔管5min后(T4)的心率、收缩压、舒张压、皮质醇(Cor)、去甲肾上腺素(NE),并采用术后恢复问卷表(QoR-40)评估两组术后24h恢复质量,对比两组苏醒时视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间。结果 两组手术时间、麻醉起效时间、出血量、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间比较无明显差异(P>0.05),A组术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用量少于B组(P<0.05);T1-T3时间段A组心率、收缩压、舒张压、Cor、Ne水平波动幅度小于B组(P<0.05);A组术后24h恢复质量高于B组,苏醒时VAS评分低于B组(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜术中以丙泊酚+瑞马唑仑+舒芬太尼+瑞芬太尼+顺阿曲库铵麻醉行麻醉诱导的镇静、镇痛效果显著,可有效稳定患者血流动力学,减轻应激反应,促进术后恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effects of different anesthesia induction drugs on hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods 64 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in our hospital from January 2022 to February 2024 were selected and divided into group A (32 cases) and group B (32 cases) by random double-blind method. Both groups were given remazolam + Sufentanil + remifentanil + cisatracurium anesthesia induction, group A plus propofol anesthesia induction, group B plus etomidate anesthesia induction. The surgical conditions and heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cortisol (Cor) and norepinephrine (NE) of the two groups before induction (T0), after induction (T1), intubation (T2), skin resection (T3), and 5min after extubation (T4) were statistically compared and compared. The postoperative recovery questionnaire (QoR 40) was used to evaluate the quality of recovery 24h after surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) score, recovery time and recovery time of orientation were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in operation time, anesthesia onset time, blood loss, recovery time and orientation recovery time between the two groups (P > 0.05). The intraoperative dosage of propofol and remifentanil in group A was lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). The fluctuation range of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, Cor and Ne levels in group A was lower than that in group B during T1-T3 (P < 0.05). The quality of recovery 24h after operation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the VAS score at recovery was lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion During laparoscopy, anesthesia induced sedation and analgesia with propofol + remazolam + Sufentanil + remifentanil + cisatracurium can effectively stabilize the hemodynamics of patients, reduce stress response and promote postoperative recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王长江.比较不同麻醉诱导药物在老年患者腹腔镜手术中的血流动力学稳定性和术后恢复情况[J].四川生理科学杂志,2026,48(2):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-09
  • 最后修改日期:2025-01-13
  • 录用日期:2025-01-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码