血管支架成形术与颈动脉内膜剥脱术对预防缺血性脑血管病的长期效果的对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

临颍县人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative study of the long-term effect of stenting and carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of ischemic cerebrovascular disease
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探究颈动脉内膜剥脱术(carotid endarterectomy,CEA)与血管支架形成术(carotid artery stenting,CAS)对预防缺血性脑血管病(Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease,ICVD)的长期效果对比。方法 选取2021年5月-2023年7月期间本院收治的ICVD患者105例作为研究对象。根据手术方案的不同将患者分为CEA组(予以CEA治疗,n=53例)和CAS组(予以CAS治疗,n=52例)。分析对比两组的血管通畅率、血管狭窄率、并发生发生情况以及心血管事件发生情况。结果 两组术后3个月、术后6个月、术后12个月不同时间点的血管通畅率均无显著差异(P>0.05);但CAS组术后12个月的血管通畅率显著低于其术后3个月的血管通畅率(P<0.05)。两组术后3个月、6个月的血管狭窄率比较均无显著差异(P>0.05);术后12个月,CEA组的血管狭窄率显著低于CAS组(P<0.05);CAS组术后12个月的血管再狭窄率显著高于术后3个月、术后6个月(P<0.05);CEA组术后12个月的血管再狭窄率显著低于术后3个月(P<0.05)。两组在围手术期的高灌注综合征、高血压、局部血肿以及颈动脉急性闭塞的发生率均无显著差异(P>0.05);但CAS组的低血压发生率显著低于CEA组(P<0.05)。两组的心血管事件总发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 CAS与CEA治疗ICVD均具有较高疗效,且远期心血管风险低,但CEA的远期血管狭窄率更低,CAS围手术期并发症较少。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (carotid artery stenting), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting, Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) Comparison of the long-term effects of CAS in the prevention of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease (ICVD). Methods 105 patients with ICVD admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to July 2023 were selected as the study objects. The patients were divided into CEA group (CEA treatment, n=53 cases) and CAS group (CAS treatment, n=52 cases) according to different surgical protocols. The vascular patency rate, vascular stenosis rate, co-occurrence and cardiovascular events of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results There were no significant differences in the vascular patency rate at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the vascular patency rate at 12 months after surgery in CAS group was significantly lower than that at 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of vascular stenosis at 3 months and 6 months after surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the rate of vascular stenosis in CEA group was significantly lower than that in CAS group (P<0.05). The restenosis rate in CAS group at 12 months after surgery was significantly higher than that at 3 months and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The restenosis rate in CEA group at 12 months after surgery was significantly lower than that at 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of perioperative hyperperfusion syndrome, hypertension, local hematoma and acute carotid artery occlusion between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the incidence of hypotension in CAS group was significantly lower than CEA group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of cardiovascular events between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both CAS and CEA have high efficacy and low long-term cardiovascular risk in the treatment of ICVD, but CEA has lower long-term vascular stenosis rate and fewer perioperative complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋新阁.血管支架成形术与颈动脉内膜剥脱术对预防缺血性脑血管病的长期效果的对比研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2025,47(5):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-05
  • 最后修改日期:2024-11-28
  • 录用日期:2024-12-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-18
  • 出版日期: